Resources
Sugarcane Burning Rules
Current sugarcane burning rules (as of February 2020)
Per FL statute section 590.02(10) The Florida Forest Service (FFS) under the control of the Department of Florida Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) has the exclusive authority to require and issue agricultural burn permits. See here.
FFS has broad authority to set specific rules for specific type of burns via Florida Administrative Code 5I-2.006 Open Burning Allowed
Sugarcane burn zone map and rules prior to October 2019 modifications
The discriminatory burn regulations were put in place in 1991 in response to the public outcry generated by residents in the newly developed town of Wellington located in Central Palm Beach County. The wind-based sugar cane field burning regulations were put in place to spare the more affluent communities to the east but resulted in concentrating all of the burn pollution on the lower-income Glades communities to the west. News stories from that period can be found here and here.
Florida Forest Service Satellite Burn Map where sugarcane burns along with their smoke and ash plumes on any given day can be viewed.
As many as 70+ plus burn permits covering 5,000 acres impacting an area of up to 1500 square miles can be approved upon a single day during the harvesting season. In the 2018-2019 harvest season alone, 11,334 burns across 442,409 acres took place and only 3% of all sugarcane permits submitted were denied.
Environmental Justice
“Environmental Justice” refers to laws, policies, and corporate practices that allow for lower-income communities of color to be disproportionately impacted by toxic pollution. Environmental Justice promotes the principle that everyone has a right to a healthy environment along with equal protection and equal enforcement of environmental laws and regulations. The term also refers to the grassroots movement to address laws, policies, and corporate practices that disproportionately expose minority communities to environmental pollution around the world. To learn more about the Environmental Justice movement see here, here and here.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental justice screening and mapping tool measures a population’s vulnerability to environmental factors such as air quality, cancer risk, respiratory health impacts, and lead paint exposure, based on the population’s percentage of low-income and minority residents.
The Glades rank on average in the 80 –100 percentile range in both cancer and respiratory health impacts vulnerability as compared to the EPA region, state, and nation as whole. The City of South Bay stands out as the most vulnerable communities in the nation with 99 percentile EJ index vulnerability in the NATA respiratory impacts category and a 98 percentile Ej index Cancer risk rating. This means that compared to other cities/census block groups in the nation only 1 to 2 percent respectively have an equal or higher Ej index vulnerability ranking in those categories:
Emissions Data
“Burning Cane: Assessment of Current Air Quality Monitoring During Sugarcane Harvest in the EAA,”
PAHs, carbonyls, VOCs and PM2.5 emission factors for pre-harvest burning of Florida sugarcane
2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Data Queries: According to the current EPA National Emissions Inventory data, Palm Beach County alone emits more emissions from agricultural fires attributable to sugarcane field burning than any other county in the entire United States for pollutants including: PM2.5, PM 10, NH3, CO, NOX, SO2, VOC’s, Acetaldehyde Benzene, Formaldehyde and more.
Regional Air Quality Monitoring
Despite the wide array of air pollutants released from pre-harvest sugar burning there is currently only one official state-run air quality monitoring device located in the entire EAA which measures for only one pollutant PM2.5, and is registered as non-regulatory meaning it does not meet standards required for its data to be used to determine compliance with NAAQS. See page 20, table 4.2 here.
The accuracy of air quality monitoring devices can be affected by meteorological conditions that can prevent accurate readings to be measured from short-term fluctuations in air pollution caused by pre-harvest burning in the EAA during the harvesting season. Air quality ranking systems that rely on annual average PM2.5 measurements Such as Robert Wood Johnson Foundation rankings can miss important short-term fluctuations in air quality as exemplified by the pre-harvest sugar burning that takes place only on a seasonal basis. See measure limitations here.
For more information on the limitations of the current regional air quality monitoring in the glades along with known toxic pollution emitted by the practice see: “Burning Cane: Assessment of Current Air Quality Monitoring During Sugarcane Harvest in the EAA,”
Health Data
Find Stop the Burn summaries of major studies here.
August 2022: Impacts of Sugarcane Fires on Air Quality and Public Health in South Florida
August 2018: Sugarcane cutting work, risks, and health effects: a literature review
December 2016: AGRICULTURAL FIRES AND INFANT HEALTH
November 2016: Particulate matter produced during commercial sugarcane harvesting and processing: A respiratory health hazard?
April 2016: Black Carbon and Particulate Organic Toxics Emitted by Sugarcane Burning in Veracruz, México
October 2015: Association between sugar cane burning and acute respiratory illness on the island of Maui
September 2015: Cytogenetic biomonitoring of occupationally exposed workers to ashes from burning of sugar cane in Ahome, Sinaloa, México
July 2015: Air Pollution-Induced Vascular Dysfunction: Potential Role of Endothelin-1 (ET-1) System
November 2014: Effect of particles of ashes produced from sugarcane burning on the respiratory system of rats
September 2014: Burnt Sugarcane Harvesting Is Associated with Acute Renal Dysfunction
January 2014: Respiratory toxicity of repeated exposure to particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning
October 2013: Emissions Generated by Sugarcane Burning Promote Genotoxicity in Rural Workers: a Case Study in Barretos, Brazil
June 2013: Sugar Cane Burning and Human Health: a Spatial Difference-in-Difference Analysis
January 2013: Sugar cane manufacturing is associated with tuberculosis in an indigenous population in Brazil
October 2012: Influence of Sugarcane Burning on Indoor/Outdoor PAH Air Pollution in Brazil
October 2012: The Central American Epidemic of CKD
September 2012: Burnt sugarcane harvesting – cardiovascular effects on a group of healthy workers, Brazil
September 2012: Review of Aerosol Observations by Lidar and Chemical Analysis in the State of So Paulo Brazil
June 2012: Asthma and allergies in Jamaican children aged 2–17 years: a cross-sectional prevalence survey
February 2012: Pre-Harvest Sugarcane Burning: Determination of Emission Factors through Laboratory Measurements (Brazil)
November 2011: Short Term Effects of Air Pollution from Biomass Burning in Mucociliary Clearance of Brazilian Sugarcane Cutters
October 2011: Sugar cane burning pollution and respiratory symptoms in schoolchildren in Monte Aprazível, Southeastern Brazil
June 2011: Abstract: Increasing Incidence of Asthma, Allergy and Eczema in Rural Honduran Children
July 2010: Impact of outdoor biomass air pollution on hypertension hospital admissions
December 2010: Work and health conditions of sugar cane workers in Brazil
December 2010: PM2.5 and PM10: The influence of sugarcane burning on potential cancer risk
September 2008: Comparative respiratory toxicity of particles produced by traffic and sugar cane burning
April 2008: Sugarcane Burning in Brazil: Respiratory Health Effects
August 2007: Air Pollution from Biomass Burning and Asthma Hospital Admissions in a Sugarcane Plantation area in Brazil
February 2007: Respiratory health in Brazil
November 2006: Effects of genetic polymorphisms CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 on urinary 1-hydroxypyrene levels in sugarcane workers
January 2006: The Impact of Sugar Cane–Burning Emissions on the Respiratory System of Children and the Elderly
April 2004: Biomass Burning and its Effects on Health
September 2001: Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum L) Burning and Asthma in Southeast Louisiana, USA
October 2000: Assessment of the Effects of Sugar Cane Plantation Burning on Daily Counts of Inhalation Therapy
August 1999: Case-control Study of Lung Cancer Among Sugarcane Farmers in India
Environmental Impacts Research
Carbon Assessment of The Everglades Agricultural Area
Remote Sensing and Sustainability Analysis of Sugarcane within the Everglades Agricultural Area
Everglades Agricultural Area Soil Subsidence and Sustainability
Carbon Footprint of Biofuel Sugarcane Produced in Mineral and Organic Soils in Florida
Global Green Harvesting Trends
Brazil’s Green Protocol agreement began the phase-out of pre-harvest sugar field burning in the sugar growing region of Sao Paulo in 2007. As of 2020, all farms where mechanical harvesters can operate now green harvest. Phasing out pre-harvest sugar field burning prevented the emission of 9.91 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere and more than 59 million tons of pollutants, including carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and particles.
The transition to green harvesting in Brazil also reduced annual hospital admission rates for respiratory issues especially in individuals younger than 15 and older than 60. See here.
More general information on the Green Protocol:
Brazil sugarcane mills agree to end burning by 17
The Green Cane Project is the world’s largest regenerative organic agricultural operation in the world; it supplies one-third of the world’s organic sugarcane supply on over 54,000 acres in Sao Paulo Brazil. The project was started by the Balbo Group, a family-run company operating under the Native Brand name. They started green harvesting in 1986 and have achieved the following accomplishments:
Achieved 20% higher yields than conventionally grown sugarcane
Created 11,400 acres of ‘Biodiversity Islands’, planted over 1 million trees, and have documented greater biodiversity over the surrounding area
A certified carbon neutral farming operation that generates enough electricity at their mills to provide power to a nearby city of over 540,000 people
Learn more about Native Brand and the Green Cane Project:
The Native Green Cane Project – The Ultimate Sustainability Story
The New Sustainability Champions
Stop The Burn Campaign goes to Brazil
Video: “Is this the Future of Global Food Systems?”
The Brazlian sugar industry utilizes sugarcane trash in generation of electricity and the production of biofuels. Sugarcane trash has (leaves and tops) have similar energy content to sugarcane bagasse, the bio-product left over after sugar is refined from cane stalks at the mill. In Brazil, they have shown utilizing sugarcane trash can produce nearly twice as much exportable electricity per ton of cane crushed, resulting in nearly twice as much displacement of fossil-fuel generated grid electricity:
Improving the sustainability of the Brazilian sugar cane industry
Optimising Sugarcane Trash Management for Biofuels Production in Australia and Brazil
2G ethanol from the whole sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass
In Australia, one of the world’s largest sugarcane exporting nations, the majority of sugarcane is green harvested. Rocky Point Mulching is a family-run farm and business that makes more money from their sugarcane trash than the sugarcane grown on their farms. Sugarcane trash is baled, bagged and sold as commercial mulch:
Turning cane trash into treasure
Australia’s sugarcane industry is also leading the way in developing new forms of sustainable biofuel from sugarcane trash, called biomethane, that can eliminate the use of fossil fuels on sugarcane farms by fueling trucks, harvesters, and tractors without the need of diesel fuel:
How a waste product from the sugar industry could soon power the trucks that carry it
In Zimbabwe, the company Green Fuel uses Brazilian-style green harvesting for biofuel production at their sugarcane mill:
Video of green harvesting operations in Zimbabwe
In Cuba, an estimated 70% of the sugarcane is green harvested:
Sugarcane Trash as Biomass Resource
In Thailand, the government announced plans to phase out sugarcane burning in August of 2019:
Industry Ministry plans end to sugarcane burning in three years:
The Indian Government has instituted laws and policy to end sugarcane burning:
Govt asks farmers to stop burning sugarcane thrash
Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions
Indian state of Uttar Pradesh has outlawed sugarcane burning and sets up machine banks for farmers to help facilitate green harvesting.
Indian start-up company RY Energies has developed a business whereby they collect sugarcane trash from farmers who receive proceeds from the selling the trash as biomass fuel energy production creating a win-win situation incentivizing green harvesting over pre-harvest burning
Sugarcane farmers in India have also began to recognize the benefits of using sugarcane trash as cattle feed:
Utilization of sugarcane trash for livestock feeding: An alternative to on-farm burning
In the Philippines research has shown Microcrystalline Cellulose can be derived from sugarcane trash for use as a disintegrant in medicine that works more efficiently than current commercial disintegrate in use. This same Microcrystalline Cellulose can be used in cosmetics and food products in addition to medicine.
In order to be certified organic, the sugarcane must be sustainably green harvested. Some major organic sugarcane producing nations are Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina, Columbia, Ecuador, Mexico, Costa Rica, and India. There is even a small amount of roughly 4000 acres of green harvested organic sugarcane grown on a rotating basis by Florida Crystals in Florida.
In Louisiana a company called American Biocarbon partnered with the Cora Texas Sugar Mill in White Castle Louisiana to utilize green harvested sugarcane trash to create biocarbon pellets (biochar). These pellets are sold as a form of renewable biomass energy used for electricity generation. The Cora Texas Sugar Mill has installed a state of the art detrasher unit which cleans the cane billets prior to entering the mill and also separates and collects trash that is then used to produce biochar. The detrasher unit increases milling efficiency and reduces overall milling costs leading to higher profits. The same biochar can be used as organic fertilizer and as a water sorbent to remove heavy metals from water:
Adding Value to Sugar Crop Trash & Byproducts Detrasher unit.
Research on the state of the art detrashing unit and benefits of sugarcane trash and bagasse derived biochar carried out by the USDA Agricultural Research Service:
First year operation of a mechanical detrasher system at a Louisiana sugarcane factory
Improved sugar yields found by application of bagasse and leaf residue biochar as soil amendment
Effect of feed source and pyrolysis conditions on properties and metal sorption by sugarcane biochar
A company called US Envirofuels has a plan for a proposed Brazilian-style advanced biofuel ethanol plant fed by green harvested sugarcane and sorghum:
Highlands EnviroFuels, LLC Economic Impact Study for Sugar-Based Advanced Biofuel Ethanol Plant projected the creation of 60 full-time high paying permanent jobs and nearly 700 indirect and induced jobs.
CROPS Carbon Harvest is a company utilizing crop waste for deep ocean sequestration, providing an alternative for crop burning that can mitigate climate change and benefit farmers at the same time.
A company called Verde Visions LLC seeks to utilize sugarcane trash in Florida to make biofuel based Very Low Sulfer Fuel Oil (VLSFO) which will provide a sustainable form of biodiesel fuel to help green the shipping industry
California Ethanol Power, LLC is planning to open a plant to produce sugarcane-derived electricity and ethanol from sugarcane grown in Imperial Valley, California where green harvested sugarcane trash would be used as either animal forage or further biofuel feedstock.
In 2018, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded the University of Illinois a $10.6 million, five-year grant to the Renewable Oil Generated with Ultra-productive Energycane (ROGUE) research project to develop strains of sugarcane with up to 20% higher bio-available oils to use as a viable source of renewable bio-jet fuel. The “Energycane” produced would be green harvested to maximize the amounts of oil available for harvesting. The University of Florida is involved with growing the experimental strains of “EnergyCane” which could be grown and processed in Florida.
Federal Sugar Program
The Federal Sugar Program artificially props up the price of domestic sugar making it more expensive than what it is worth on the world market. This benefits the domestic sugar industry to the tune of $1.2 billion annually and costs taxpayers indirectly between $2-4 billion annually in addition to pushing food industry jobs overseas.
Analysis of the US sugar program
Candy‐Coated Cartel: Time to Kill the U.S. Sugar Program
Sugar Shakedown: How Politicians Conspire with the Sugar Lobby to Defraud America’s Families
Heritage Foundation Backgrounder on the Federal Sugar Program
The Federal Sugar Program provides millions of dollars of windfall profits to Florida’s top sugar producers. These profits fuel the powerful sugar lobby which disproportionately influences our political system from the local to the federal level to further the sugar industry’s interests at the expense of the environment and general public welfare. In the 2016 election cycle alone, over $8 million of federal lobbying was spent by the sugarcane industry with over $2 million spent by Florida Crystals and over $1 million spent by US Sugar. From 1994-2016, US Sugar and Florida Crystals spent $57.8 million dollars on local and state elections alone.
Meet the Sugar Barons Who Used Both Sides of American Politics to Get Billions in Subsidies.